12 More Viral Photos That Are Actually Fake
Last year was a big one for fakes. And if the first couple weeks of 2015 are any indication, we'll have plenty of fake images, silly hoaxes, and outright lies this year as well. Below we've debunked a few photos that you may have seen floating around social media recently. None are quite what they claim to be.
1) Is this Charles Manson as a baby?
Despite what historical picture accounts on Twitter might insist, this isn't Charles Manson as a baby. I contacted Jeff Guin, author of the definitive biography, Manson: The Life and Times of Charles Manson. He said that it's almost certainly not him.
From Guinn:
While I was researching my book, Manson's sister and first cousin shared family photo albums with me. That photo was not present in either instance, and in no way matches the verified photos I have of Manson as a baby. (The facial features above all.) I have never seen this picture before. Anything's possible, but I very much doubt that this is a photo of Baby Charlie.
My guess? This one likely started as a joke on Facebook or Reddit and spread quickly as a real photo after losing context from the original poster.
Fake image via HistoryInPics and Imgur
2) Is this a behind the scenes photo from National Geographic?
It's an amusing photo. But that image of National Geographic photographers running from a bear has definitely been photoshopped.
As commenters on Reddit point out, there are actually a few clues that this is a fake. But the most damning bit of evidence? The bear appears to be from a stock photo.
Below, a side-by-side of the image with the stock photo. Notice the shape of the bear's head and the green piece of grass in front of the bear's right arm.
Update: The redhead in the photo, Tim Sparks, has confirmed via Twitter that it's a fake that they made back in 2011 during a film location scout in Colorado. He says it was posted to Facebook and it went viral from there.
Fake image via HistoricalPics
3) Is this an old magic trick gone wrong?
With a caption like "magic trick gone wrong," it's easy to imagine the photos above as depicting a magician nearly escaping from drowning. We're left to think a scantily clad performer heroically grabbed an ax and freed a grateful woman. The problem? That's not what these pictures show at all. And in fact, the real story is far more interesting.
The woman with the ax, Kitty West (also known as Evangeline the Oyster Girl), smashed the glass box in rage. West was a burlesque performer on Bourbon Street in New Orleans during the late 1940s. Her act included emerging from an enormous oyster shell, thus the name Oyster Girl. One night in 1949 a rival performer from out of town, Divena the Aqua Tease, got top billing over West, which seemed to really upset her. Divena's act involved an underwater strip tease in a giant glass case filled with water. So you can see where this is going.
"I just wanted to break the tank in a million pieces," West would later recall. Life magazinereported that 400 gallons of water poured onto the stage, causing many in the audience to flee. Once the water had drained, West attacked Divena by pulling her hair. West was promptly arrested, and the whole thing (complete with photos of West at the police station) was published in Life.
Inaccurate photo description via OldPicsArchive
4) Is this Princess Diana giving the finger?
No, that's not Princess Di flipping the bird. It's another photo by Alison Jackson, a British photographer known for her staged images of celebrity lookalikes.
Historical photo accounts on Twitter are constantly posting Jackson's images. Twitter is littered with countless Marilyn Monroe and JFK images that are actually Jackson's handiwork using lookalikes. Throw this one on the pile.
Fake image via OldPicsArchive
5) Is this a photo from NASA of India during Diwali?
As the space debunker FakeAstroPix points out, this "NASA photo" of India during the Hindu festival of Diwali is fake. It's actually quite an old fake as well, dating to at least 2012. But that doesn't stop so many OMGSPACE and OMGSCIENCE Twitter accounts from sharing it here in 2015.
What does it really show? It's a composite of satellite images from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 2003 that has been shaded different colors. The different colors are supposed to show population growth over time. Cool image? Sure. But not what so many people say it is.
Fake photo via AmazingPicX
6) Is this an anti-weed ad?
No, this isn't an anti-drug ad. it's actually a photo by Martin Ferko of Anna Guimm, a designer whose method of creating ceramic dolls involves putting them in an oven. Someone has photoshopped anti-weed messaging onto the image.
Normally, this kind of thing would be done in a kiln, but Guimm's DIY oven method seems to work perfectly fine for her. Even if it makes for a terrifying image when taken out of context.
And before you rush down to the comments to let me know that nobody thought this was a real ad, allow me to assure you that there is always someone who thinks it's a real ad.
Inaccurate photo via Reddit
7) Is this a 1950s car show?
The photo above does come from a car show that took place at a Thrifty Drug store parking lot in Los Angeles on May 15, 1954. But it's not exactly as it would've appeared to people who were actually there.
The photo was colorized by Rik Hoving back in 2006, though the HistoryInPics version crops out mention of his name. Colorized photos aren't necessarily "fake." But as I've said before, we have to ask ourselves what happens to history when a colorized photo supplants the original in web searches.
HistoryInPics often tweets colorized photos without identifying them as such. To be honest, this seems like a rather minor sin compared with all the other misinformation they spread. But it's something that we need to keep in mind with all these historical photo accounts.
Who decides that the green car is actually green and not blue or black or even purple? Photo colorizers are often dedicated people who painstakingly research possibilities before altering historical documents. But when their work is shared without any mention that the photo has been colorized, the people of the future are left with a rather skewed impression of history.
Colorized photo via HistoryInPics
8) Is this a shooting star and its reflection?
As the always excellent Twitter photo sleuth PicPedant points out, the picture above isn't a shooting star. It's actually a 2-minute long exposure of a space shuttle launch in 2010. By leaving the camera's shutter open for 2 minutes, the launch appears to be a long fiery trail. But it's most definitely not a shooting star.
Inaccurate photo description via TheMindBlowing
9) Is this a kitchen chair floating in space, referred to as "Escape Vehicle No. 6" by astronauts?
Could there really be a kitchen chair in orbit? No. This image comes from a 2009 ad campaign by Toshiba for LCD TVs. Sadly, there is no chair currently circling the globe.
The title "Escape Vehicle No. 6" comes from a 2004 art piece by Simon Faithfull that was similar in concept. Faithful says that Toshiba's ad agency approached him about a collaboration but he didn't work on the ad.
Fake image via HistoricalPics and SciencePorn
10) Is this an "incredibly rare" black lion?
No, there are no black lions. As the Museum of Hoaxes points out, this is a pure photoshop job. The original photo shows that the lion is actually white.
Fake image via TheMindBlowing
11) Is this an 1880s female street gang from London called the Clockwork Oranges?
Those are some dapper looking women who might rough you up if you met them in a dark alley. But whoever they were, they weren't an 1880s female street gang called the Clockwork Oranges.
There were indeed female street gangs in 19th century London. But the term Clockwork Orange wasn't used in reference to a street gang until Anthony Burgess's 1962 book. According toBurgess, the book gets its title from an old cockney slang phrase "as queer as a clockwork orange."
As the caption to the obviously cropped photograph reads: "group of women having a smoke, gelatin silver print c. 1896."
Fake image via OldPicsArchive and the Victorian Academy of Magick
12) Is this really Einstein riding a bicycle near a nuclear test?
This photo may seem like one of those that's so absurd, no one could ever believe it deals. But people do. And they keep sharing it far and wide across social media. Like a cockroach scurrying around during Nuclear Winter, the image just won't die. But yes, it's a fake.
Fake photo via OldPicsArchive
Looking for more fakes? Check out just how many lies Uberfacts is spreading, nine things that Albert Einstein never actually said, and all 86 fake images we debunked in 2014.
Factually is Gizmodo's blog of fun facts, debunkings, and weird trivia. Join us on Twitter and Facebook.
pretty mannish hand
The movement of the stars over the course o fthe exposure is a dead giveaway that it's a long exposure. A shooting star would happen in a second or two.
not to say there couldn't be a black or melanic lion. it's just very very unlikely.
I have seen a picture of a melanic barn owl though
If only my camera had been pointed a wee bit to the left I could've had a fairly similar photo to that "shooting star". It was during the Perseid meteor shower 3 years ago when a _very_ bright one streaked across the sky, complete with reflection in the lake I was standing in front of. Still pisses me off that my damn camera was pointed the wrong way.
Internet people seem to be split between to extremes:
People who will believe anything (eg the pictures above)
People who refuse that anything even remotely remarkable is real and claim that everything is fake.
I'm sure there are people who both believe fake things while accusing real things of being fake.
Another one that is begging to be debunked is this often shared "satellite photo of Brazil published by NASA at the time of the World Cup":
Guh that's a great shot.
no one thought this was real!
(you asked for this!)
I actually went to college with the red bearded guy in the near photo. He couldn't believe how popular the photo got. I think he even did a Reddit AMA and will always be the first to tell you that the photo is clearly faked. I'll see if I can get him to chime in on this article.
Divena the Aqua Tease
One of the lesser known but more interesting DC Comics superheroes
Of course it is not Divali. Sri Lanka don't celebrate divali as in India. People who celebrate divali in Sri Lanka are Hindu Tamils, and majority are living on north of the island. According to this image, nothern Sri Lanka is dark, while the west and south are bright.
HistoryInPics and all that shit on twitter is a giant waste of time. Not only are most of them just flat out wrong, but also they keep pushing pictures of Led Zeppelin, Janis Joplin, etc off as actual honest to god history.
That story about the burlesque girls is great!
While an interesting interpretation of what the colors were, they seem too modernized. Replace the people in the image with people of today and I would say it looks like a car show from last summer. You didn't see colors like that back then.
The cropped out part of that photo of women smoking was used as the cover of a book titled "Women in Pants" http://www.amazon.com/Women-Pants-Ma... where they look much less like a street gang and more like women dressed as men for a joke or party.
Wonderful! Thanks for sharing! I tried to find the original photo but couldn't. Do you know where the photo comes from?
I can't tell from the Amazon preview. Maybe there's a credit in the book but I don't have a copy.
It looks like the photos in the book are from the collection of Cynthia Greighttp://cynthiagreig.com/cynthiagreig/a... so she might have more information.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.